Iranian Emergency Medical Service Response in Disaster; Report of three Earthquakes

  • Peyman Saberian Anesthesiology Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Pir-Hossein Kolivand National Emergency Medical Service Organization, Tehran, Iran.
  • Parisa Hasani-Sharamin Tehran Emergency Medical Service Center, Tehran, Iran.
  • Fatemeh Dadashi Tehran Emergency Medical Service Center, Tehran, Iran
  • Amirreza Farhoud Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Civil Defense, Earthquakes, Emergency Medical Services, Patient Transfer, Surge Capacity

Abstract

 Introduction: The earthquake is one of the most natural catastrophic crises that can cause a lot of casualties. Considering an earthquake-prone country, Iran is ranked as one of the world's most dangerous countries. Objective: In this article, we describe the actions taken by emergency medical service (EMS) after the earthquake in Kermanshah, Varzaghan, and Bam and compared the strengths and weaknesses of the emergency response program and the limitations and challenges of this system in dealing with these major crises. Method: This study is a cross-sectional study that compares some of the information and findings related to three earthquakes that occurred in Iran, including Bam, Varzaghan and Sarpol-e-Zahab earthquakes. The data reported in the present article is descriptive and is based on various independent sources such as National Emergency Operation Center, Local Emergency Operations Center (EOC), the EMS of the country, the World Health Organization, the United Nations, the statistics website, the Forensic Data website, the International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, conferences and personal interviews. To ensure the credibility of the information, the authors reported data that had been verified by two or more sources. Results: The characteristics of the geographic area of the 3 earthquakes has been described. Post-earthquake response activities were described in details in subheadings including rapid warning and response, surge capacity plan, rapid response teams, emergency medical teams, increasing the capacity of health facilities, increasing transfer capacity, and handling, transportation and distribution of injuries. Conclusion: In the recent earthquake, had been occurred in Sarpol-e-Zahab, the health response of the country was largely satisfactory. The existence of structures such as EOC at various levels, the unified incident command system, emergency operations plan, and Medical Care Monitoring Center are among the most important reasons for satisfactory performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bartlett JG. Public health guidance for community-level preparedness and response to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2004;12(3):185-7.
2. Li T, Jiang X, Chen H, Yang Z, Wang X, Wang M. Orthopaedic injury analysis in the 2010 Yushu, China earthquake. Injury. 2012;43(6):886-90.
3. https://www.un.org.ir/all-stories/itemlist/category/99-disasters
4. List of earthquakes in Iran; Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_earthquakes_in_Iran.
5. Guha-Sapir D, Vos F, Below R, Ponserre S. Annual disaster statistical review 2011: the numbers and trends. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED); 2012.
6. Ashkenazi I, Isakovich B, Kluger Y, Alfici R, Kessel B, Better OS. Prehospital management of earthquake casualties buried under rubble. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(2):122-33.
7. Seyedin H, Ryan J, Sedghi S. Lessons learnt from the past and preparedness for the future: how a developing country copes with major incidents. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(10):887-91.
8. Djalali A, Khankeh H, Öhlén G, Castrén M, Kurland L. Facilitators and obstacles in pre-hospital medical response to earthquakes: a qualitative study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19(1):30.
9. McKay MP. Commentary: Emergency medical services: just the beginning of an effective system. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(4):454-6.
10. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366-78.
11. Hardy S, Fattah S, Wisborg T, Raatiniemi L, Staff T, Rehn M. Systematic reporting to improve the emergency medical response to major incidents: a pilot study. BMC Emerg Med. 2018;18(1):4.
12. Ardagh MW, Richardson SK, Robinson V, Than M, Gee P, Henderson S, et al. The initial health-system response to the earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, in February, 2011. Lancet. 2012;379(9831):2109-15.
13. Seyedin SH. Health systems effectiveness and efficiency for disasters and conflicts: University of London, University College London (United Kingdom); 2008.
14. Report of the November 12, 2017 earthquake Kermanshah Province (Fifth Edition); Available from:http://www.iiees.ac.ir/fa/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Report_earthquake_Sarpol-e-Zahab_5th_edition_volume3-Chapter-4-14_1396-10-05f.pdf.
Published
2019-01-14
How to Cite
Saberian, P., Kolivand, P.-H., Hasani-Sharamin, P., Dadashi, F., & Farhoud, A. (2019). Iranian Emergency Medical Service Response in Disaster; Report of three Earthquakes. Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine, 3(2), e13. https://doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.121
Section
Original article