Comparing the Effects of Hydroxyethyl Starch and Albumin in Cirrhotic Patients with Tense Ascites; a Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Alireza Abootalebi Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0775-2910
  • Sepideh Khazaei Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Mohammad Minakari Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-9315
  • Mohammad Nasr-Isfahani Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-5038
  • Mehrdad Esmailian Emergency Medicine Research Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Al-Zahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-4462
  • Farhad Heydari Emergency Medicine Research Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Al-Zahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-0045
Keywords: Albumins, Ascites, Hydroxyethyl starch derivatives, Liver cirrhosis, Serum albumin

Abstract

Introduction: Large-volume paracentesis is one of the usual treatments for cirrhotic patients with tense ascites, which may cause different complications including decreased cardiac preload, suppressed renin angiotensin system, inactivation of sympathetic nervous system, electrolyte imbalances, etc. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of administrating hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and albumin in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites in order to reduce the paracentesis complications. Methods: In the present randomized clinical trial, 108 cirrhotic patients with tense ascites were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups. In group A, albumin 20% with 5 g/L dose of paracentesis fluid, in group B, HES 6% dissolved in saline were administered, and in group C, a combination of albumin 20% and HES 6% with half the dosage administrated to two other groups were prescribed. Then biochemical panel, and liver function tests and renal and electrolyte complications were compared between the groups. Results: The results obtained after intervention did not show significant differences between the groups regarding weight (p=0.102), heart rate and platelet count (both p=0.094), hematocrit (p=0.09), creatinine (p=0.421), serum sodium (p=0.743) and potassium (p=0.147), total bilirubin (p=0.375) and urine volume (p=0.421). Additionally, we concluded that mean arterial pressure of patients who had received albumin was higher than the other 2 groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results of the present study showed the similar effects of HES and albumin in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites undergoing large-volume paracentesis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ahmed F. Comment on ‘Ascitic Fluid Analysis in the Differential Diagnosis of Ascites: Focus on Cirrhotic Ascites’. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017;5(2):184.
2. Pedersen JS, Bendtsen F, Møller S. Management of cirrhotic ascites. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2015;6(3):124-37.
3. Wiest R, Lawson M, Geuking M. Pathological bacterial translocation in liver cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2014;60(1):197-209.
4. Chinchilla-López P, Hamdan-Pérez N, Guerrero-Ixtlahuac J, Barranco-Fragoso B, Méndez-Sánchez N. The Role of TIPS in Patients with Refractory Ascites and Portal Vein Thrombosis. Ann Hepatol. 2017;16(4):619-20.
5. Facciorusso A, Cosimo Nacchiero M, Rosania R, Laonigro G, Longo N, Panella C, et al. The use of human albumin for the treatment of ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis: item of safety, facts, controversies and perspectives. Curr Drug Saf. 2011;6(4):267-74.
6. Wong F. Drug insight: the role of albumin in the management of chronic liver disease. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;4(1):43-51.
7. Martin DK, Walayat S, Jinma R, Ahmed Z, Ragunathan K, Dhillon S. Large-volume paracentesis with indwelling peritoneal catheter and albumin infusion: a community hospital study. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016;6(5):32421.
8. Widjaja FF, Khairan P, Kamelia T, Hasan I. Colloids Versus Albumin in Large Volume Paracentesis to Prevent Circulatory Dysfunction: Evidence-based Case Report. Acta Med Indones. 2016;48(2):148-55.
9. Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ, Sibbald WJ. Albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of postoperative bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(2):527-33.
10. Abdel-Khalek EE, Arif SE. Randomized trial comparing human albumin and hydroxyethyl starch 6% as plasma expanders for treatment of patients with liver cirrhosis and tense ascites following large volume paracentesis. Arab Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010;11(1):24-9.
11. Alsebaey A, Abdel-Razek W, Bassuni A, Rewisha E, Khalil M, Waked I. Prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction: could we use other albumin alternatives? Egypt Liver J. 2013;3(4):118-25.
12. Altman C, Bernard B, Roulot D, Vitte R-L, Ink O. Randomized comparative multicenter study of hydroxyethyl starch versus albumin as a plasma expander in cirrhotic patients with tense ascites treated with paracentesis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;10(1):5-10.
13. Fernández J, Monteagudo J, Bargallo X, Jiménez W, Bosch J, Arroyo V, et al. A randomized unblinded pilot study comparing albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatology. 2005;42(3):627-34.
14. Bernardi M, Caraceni P, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Albumin infusion in patients undergoing large‐volume paracentesis: a meta‐analysis of randomized trials. Hepatology. 2012;55(4):1172-81.
Published
2017-10-12
How to Cite
Abootalebi, A., Khazaei, S., Minakari, M., Nasr-Isfahani, M., Esmailian, M., & Heydari, F. (2017). Comparing the Effects of Hydroxyethyl Starch and Albumin in Cirrhotic Patients with Tense Ascites; a Randomized Clinical Trial. Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1(1), e7. https://doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v1i1.17
Section
Original article