To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule

  • Abdul-Sajjad Pathan Department of Emergency Medicine, Luton and Dunstable NHS University Hospital Trust, Luton, UK.
  • Eleonora Chakarova Department of Emergency Medicine, Luton and Dunstable NHS University Hospital Trust, Luton, UK.
  • Aamir Tarique Department of Emergency Medicine, Luton and Dunstable NHS University Hospital Trust, Luton, UK.
Keywords: Acute headache, Clinical decision rule, Emergency department, Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Abstract

Introduction: The Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage rule (OSR) is a clinical decision tool identified for ruling out subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in those patient above 15 years of age who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute onset atraumatic headache. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to externally validate the OSR in a single national health service (NHS) setting in the UK and secondly, to compare it with our current practice without using a decision rule. Method: A retrospective review of computerized medical records was done for all patients registered with headaches from January to December 2016. The data were manually charted on a data sheet from individual patient records. Patients fulfilling the preset inclusion and exclusion criteria as per the OSR were enrolled in the analysis. According to the OSR, if patient had any of the 6 criteria enlisted (age > 40 years, neck stiffness/pain, witnessed loss of consciousness, onset during exertion, thunderclap headache, limited neck flexion on examination), further diagnostic decision was required. All patients were followed up for 6 months on the computer system as it gets highlighted if the patient is represented again to the ED or is deceased. Results: A total of 737 ED visits with acute headache were reviewed for potential eligibility. Out of these, 649 were estimated to be eligible. On excluding 485 patients that could not meet the predetermined inclusion criteria and 19 patients as per the exclusion criteria, 145 (19.7%) patients were included in the analysis. There were 5 cases of SAH, yielding an incidence of 3.4 % (95% CI 1.3 % – 8.3 %). The sensitivity for SAH was 100% (95% CI, 46.3 % - 100 %); specificity of 44.2 % (95% CI, 36 % - 53 %); positive predictive value of 6.02 % (95% CI 2.2 % - 14.1 %); and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 92.7 % - 100%). Conclusion: Although being poorly specific, the OSR is a highly sensitive, simple tool for ruling out SAH in alert patients with a headache in ED settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bellolio MF, Hess EP, Gilani WI, VanDyck TJ, Ostby SA, Schwarz JA, et al. External validation of the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage clinical decision rule in patients with acute headache. American J Emerg Med. 2015;33(2):244-9.
2. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti ML, Bullard MJ, Hohl CM, Sutherland J, et al. Clinical decision rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute headache. JAMA. 2013;310(12):1248-55.
3. Mark DG, Hung YY, Offerman SR, Rauchwerger AS, Reed ME, Chettipally U, et al. Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the setting of negative cranial computed tomography results: external validation of a clinical and imaging prediction rule. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(1):1-10.e1.
4. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti ML, Bullard MJ, Lee JS, Eisenhauer M, et al. High risk clinical characteristics for subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients with acute headache: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c5204.
5. Carpenter CR, Hussain AM, Ward MJ, Zipfel GJ, Fowler S, Pines JM, et al. Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Describing the Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Lumbar Puncture With an Exploration of Test Thresholds. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(9):963-1003.
6. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Wells GA, Mortensen M, Lesiuk H, Sivilotti M, et al. Attitudes and judgment of emergency physicians in the management of patients with acute headache. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(1):33-7.
7. Perry JJ, Stiell I, Wells G, Spacek A. Diagnostic test utilization in the emergency department for alert headache patients with possible subarachnoid hemorrhage. CJEM. 2002;4(5):333-7.
8. Perry JJ, Harbaugh RE. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Sharp Needle in a Haystack. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(9):1077-9.
9. Perry JJ, Eagles D, Clement CM, Brehaut J, Kelly AM, Mason S, et al. An international study of emergency physicians' practice for acute headache management and the need for a clinical decision rule. CJEM. 2009;11(6):516-22.
10. Ward MJ, Bonomo JB, Adeoye O, Raja AS, Pines JM. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for evaluation of suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(10):1134-44.
11. Perry JJ, Sivilotti MLA, Sutherland J, Hohl CM, Emond M, Calder LA, et al. Validation of the Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule in patients with acute headache. CMAJ. 2017;189(45):E1379-e85.
12. Newman-Toker DE, Edlow JA. High-stakes diagnostic decision rules for serious disorders: the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage rule. JAMA. 2013;310(12):1237-9.
13. Sayer D, Bloom B, Fernando K, Jones S, Benton S, Dev S, et al. An Observational Study of 2,248 Patients Presenting With Headache, Suggestive of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Who Received Lumbar Punctures Following Normal Computed Tomography of the Head. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(11):1267-73.
Published
2018-04-01
How to Cite
Pathan, A.-S., Chakarova, E., & Tarique, A. (2018). To Head CT Scan or Not: The Clinical Quandary in Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; a Validation Study on Ottawa Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Rule. Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2(3), e28. https://doi.org/10.22114/ajem.v0i0.73
Section
Original article