Comparison of Three Methods for NG Tube Placement in Intubated Patients in the Emergency Department

  • Mehdi Nasr Isfahani ORCID Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  • Farhad Heydari ORCID Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  • Ahmad Azizollahi ORCID Mail Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  • Pegah Noorshargh ORCID Young Researchers and Elite Club, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Keywords:
Emergency Service, Hospital, Intubation, Gastrointestinal, Methods

Abstract

Introduction: Tubular feeding is used, in patients who cannot take food through their mouths, but their digestive system is able to digest food. This method is safe and affordable for the patient and results in maintaining the function of the digestive system and reducing the risk of infection and sepsis. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the three methods of the NG tube placement in intubated patients in the emergency department. Methods: This study is a randomized, prospective clinical trial conducted between 2016 and 2018. 75 patients who had been referred to the emergency department were enrolled in the study and divided into three groups, to have their NG tube insertion using either the conventional method (Group C), or using brake cable (Group B) or applying Rusch intubation stylet (Group S) for highwayman's hitch or draw hitch. Results: The mean duration of NG tube insertion was not significant between three groups (p=0.459), but the mean duration of NG tube insertion in group B was 18.43 ± 2.71 seconds and less than the other groups. NG tube insertion by first attempt in the group B was associated with the highest success rate. There was no significant difference, however, in the success rate in NG tube insertion on first and second attempts (p=0.376, p=0.353). Conclusions: The use of brake cable as a guide wire during insertion of a nasogastric tube increases the success rate on first attempt. No meaningful difference, however, was noted in the overall success rate in NG tube insertion on first and second attempts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Saima S, Asai T, Okuda Y. The Use of a Tracheal Tube for Guiding Nasogastric Tube Insertion. 2016;65(4):421-3.
2. Chen YC, Wang LY, Chang YJ, Yang CP, Wu TJ, Lin FR, et al. Potential risk of malposition of nasogastric tube using nose-ear-xiphoid measurement. PloS one. 2014;9(2):e88046.
3. O'Keefe S, Rolniak S, Raina A, Graham T, Hegazi R, Centa‐Wagner P. Enteral feeding patients with gastric outlet obstruction. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27(1):76-81.
4. Santos SC, Woith W, Freitas MI, Zeferino EB. Methods to determine the internal length of nasogastric feeding tubes: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;61:95-103.
5. Taylor SJ, Allan K, McWilliam H, Toher D. Nasogastric tube depth: the 'NEX' guideline is incorrect. Br J Nurs. 2014;23(12):641-4.
6. Rahimi M, Farhadi K, Changaei F, Mohammadi A. Assessment of methods to verify correct placement of nasogastric tube in intensive care unit. Iran J Nurs Res. 2015;10(1):95-101.
7. Smith AL, Santa Ana CA, Fordtran JS, Guileyardo JM. Deaths associated with insertion of nasogastric tubes for enteral nutrition in the medical intensive care unit: clinical and autopsy findings. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018;31(3):310-6.
8. Boullata JI, Carrera AL, Harvey L, Escuro AA, Hudson L, Mays A, et al. ASPEN safe practices for enteral nutrition therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(1):15-103.
9. Nieto J, Yamout S, Dechant J. Sinusitis associated with nasogastric intubation in 3 horses. Can Vet J. 2014;55(6):554-8.
10. Daliya P, White TJ, Makhdoomi KR. Gastric perforation in an adult male following nasogastric intubation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94(7):e210-2.
11. Dias B, Emidio A, Lopes M, Shimo S. Procedures for measuring and verifying gastric tube placement in newborns: an integrative review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017;25:e2908.
12. Farrington M, Lang S, Cullen L, Stewart S. Nasogastric tube placement verification in pediatric and neonatal patients. Pediatr Nurs. 2016;35(1):17-24.
13. Irving SY, Lyman B, Northington L, Bartlett JA, Kemper C; Novel Project Work Group. Nasogastric tube placement and verification in children: review of the current literature. Crit Care Nurse. 2015;34(3):67-78.
14. Green ML, Walsh BK, Wolf GK, Arnold JH. Electrocardiographic guidance for the placement of gastric feeding tubes: a pediatric case series. Respir Care. 2017;56(4):467-71.
15. Chenaitia H, Brun PM, Querellou E, Leyral J, Bessereau J, Aime C, et al. Ultrasound to confirm gastric tube placement in prehospital management. Resuscitation. 2012;83(4):447-51.
16. Imamura T, Maeda H, Kinoshita H, Shibukawa Y, Suda K, Fukuda Y, et al. confirmation of gastric tube bedside placement with the sky blue method. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;29(1):125-30.
17. Kavakli AS, Ozturk NK, Karaveli A, Onuk AA, Ozyurek L, Inanoglu K. Comparison of different methods of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017;67(6):578-83.
18. Tamhne S, Tuthill D, Evans A. Should ultrasound be routinely used to confirm correct positioning of nasogastric tubes in neonates? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;91(5):F388.
19. Rahmani N, Yaghobzade A, Shahbaznejad L. Evaluation of Adverse Effects ofNasogastric Intubations in Abdominal Surgery. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2008;17(62):69-76.
20. Ching YH, Socias SM, Ciesla DJ, Karlnoski RA, Camporesi EM, Mangar D. The difficult intraoperative nasogastric tube intubation: A review of the literature and a novel approach. SAGE Open Med. 2014;2:2050312114524390.
21. Kim HM, So BH, Jeong WJ, Choi SM, Park KN. The effectiveness of ultrasonography in verifying the placement of a nasogastric tube in patients with low consciousness at an emergency center. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20:38.
22. Lyman B, Kemper C, Northington L, Yaworski JA, Wilder K, Moore C, et al. Use of Temporary Enteral cited Devices in Hospitalized Neonatal and Pediatric Patients in the United States. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;40(4):574-80.
23. Kandeel A, Elmorhedi M, Abdalla U. Digital assistance of nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patients under general anesthesia: A single-blinded prospective randomized study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(3): 283-6.
24. Ghatak T, Samanta S, Baronia AK. A new technique to insert nasogastric tube in an unconscious intubated patient. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(1):68-70.
25. Choi JH, Kim Y, Park SW. The use of esophageal stethoscope in a difficult nasogastric tube insertion during general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2016;28:85-6.
26. Tsai YF, Luo CF, Illias A, Lin CC, Yu HP. Nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: a new and reliable method. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:99.
27. Mandal MC, Dolai S, Ghosh S, Mistri PK, Roy R, Basu SR, et al. Comparison of four techniques of nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetised, intubated patients: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(6):714-8.
28. Ghatak T, Samanta S, Baronia AK. A new technique to insert nasogastric tube in an unconscious intubated patient. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(1):68-70.
Published
2020-05-26
How to Cite
1.
Nasr Isfahani M, Heydari F, Azizollahi A, Noorshargh P. Comparison of Three Methods for NG Tube Placement in Intubated Patients in the Emergency Department. Adv J Emerg Med.
Section
Original article