Operational Strategies for Establishing Disaster-Resilient Schools: A Qualitative Study

  • Samaneh Mirzaei ORCID Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  • Abbas-Ali Dehghani-Tafti ORCID Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  • Leila Mohammadinia ORCID Health Human Resource Research Center, Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Khadijeh Nasiriani ORCID Mail Department of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran
  • Zohreh Rahaei ORCID Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  • Hossein Falahzadeh ORCID Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  • Hamidreza Amiri ORCID Department of Civil Engineering, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
Disasters, Emergencies, Resilience, Schools


Introduction: Resilient schools can warranty students’ health and survival at disasters. It is obligatory that schools be prepared for natural challenges through local programs. Considering the great population of students, disaster-resilient schools can be a safe and suitable environment for students at the time of disaster. Objective: This study aims to identify certain operational strategies for establishing schools resilient to natural disasters. Method: This qualitative study was based on conventional content analysis. Using purposive sampling method, 24 experts in the fields of health in disasters, construction engineering, psychology, teaching, and administrative management participated in the study. Maximum variation sampling continued until data saturation was achieved. The data collected via unstructured interviews were analyzed with Graneheim and Lundmen’s conventional content analysis. Results: Content analysis resulted in four main categories as operational strategies for establishing disaster-resilient schools including: 1) “construction and non-construction optimization”, with four subcategories of construct risk management, optimization of construct architecture and physical structure, correct construct localization, and promotion of non-construct safety, 2) “promotion of organizational coordination and interactions” with two subcategories, namely improvement  in intra-organizational communication and improvement  in extra-organizational communication, 3) “improvement  in education” with three subcategories of holding educational courses for families and students, holding educational courses for managers and personnel, and holding simulated exercises, and 4) “process promotion” with four subcategories of increased preparedness, correct planning, creation of organizational structure, and rehabilitation facilitation. Conclusion: Various factors affecting schools’ response to disasters form operational strategies to establish disaster-resilient schools. These strategies influence pre- and post-disaster preparedness. Awareness of these components followed by preparedness prior to disasters can save students’ lives, improve school performance after disasters, and aid in establishing disaster-resilient schools as safe lodgings.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Mutch C. The role of schools in helping communities copes with earthquake disasters: the case of the 2010–2011 New Zealand earthquakes. Environ Haz. 2018;17(4):331-51.
2. Takeuchi Y. East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: Evacuation, Communication, Education and Volunteerism: Research Publishing Service; 2012.
3. Ersoy Ş, Koçak A. Disasters and earthquake preparedness of children and schools in Istanbul, Turkey. Geomat Nat Haz Risk. 2016;7(4):1307-36.
4. Petal M. Disaster prevention for schools guidance for education sector decision-makers. Consultation version, November. 2008.
5. United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). Philippines: Humanitarian Situation Report; 2014.
6. Ilumin RC, Oreta AWC. A Post-Disaster Functional Asset Value Index for School Buildings. Procedia Eng. 2018;212:230-7.
7. Hancilar U, Çaktı E, Erdik M, Franco GE, Deodatis G. Earthquake vulnerability of school buildings: Probabilistic structural fragility analyses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2014;67:169-78.
8. Bevc CA. Towards a Culture of Prevention: Disaster Risk Reduction Begins at School: Good Practices and Lessons Learned. JSTOR; 2008.
9. Hosseini M, Izadkhah YO. Earthquake disaster risk management planning in schools. Disaster Prev Manag. 2006;15(4):649-61.
10. Shah AA, Ye J, Pan L, Ullah R, Shah SIA, Fahad S, et al. Schools’ flood emergency preparedness in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Int J Disast Risk Sci. 2018;9(2):181-94.
11. Dwiningrum SIA. Developing school resilience for disaster mitigation: a confirmatory factor analysis. Disaster Prev Manag. 2017;26(4):437-51.
12. Henderson N, Milstein MM. Resiliency in schools: Making it happen for students and educators: Corwin Press; 2003.
13. Bakkensen LA, Fox‐Lent C, Read LK, Linkov I. Validating resilience and vulnerability indices in the context of natural disasters. Risk Anal. 2017;37(5):982-1004.
14. Mohammadinia L, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Ebadi A, Malekafzali H, Ardalan A, Fazel M. Characteristics and components of children’s and adolescents’ resilience in disasters in Iran: a qualitative study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018;13(sup1):1479584.
15. Wannous C, Velasquez G, editors. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR)—UNISDR’s Contribution to Science and Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Role of the International Consortium on Landslides (ICL). Workshop on World Landslide Forum; 2017: Springer.
16. Baez JE, de la Fuente A, Santos I. Do natural disasters affect human capital? An assessment based on existing empirical evidence. IZA Discussion Papers 5164. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) [Available via the link: http://ftp.iza.org/dp5164.pdf].
17. Kuo SS, Means B. Corporate social responsibility after disaster. Wash UL Rev. 2011;89:973-1016.
18. Masten AS, Obradovic J. Disaster preparation and recovery: Lessons from research on resilience in human development. Ecol Soc. 2008;13(1):9.
19. Shaw R, Kobayashi M. Role of schools in creafing earthquake-safer environment disaster management and educafional facilifies. UNCRD, Nagoya. 2001.
20. Kisioglu AN, Demirel R, Ozturk M. Assessing the indoor environment of primary schools in the Southwest of Turkey. Indoor Built Environ. 2005;14(2):141-5.
21. Shiwaku K, Ueda Y, Oikawa Y, Shaw R. School disaster resilience assessment in the affected areas of 2011 East Japan earthquake and tsunami. Nat Hazards. 2016;82(1):333-65.
22. Grimaz S, Malisan P. VISUS: a pragmatic expert-based methodology for the seismic safety triage of school facilities. B Geofis Teor Appl. 2016;57(2):91-110.
23. Hassanain MA. Towards the design and operation of fire safe school facilities. Disaster Prev Manag. 2006;15(5):838-46.
24. Tipler K, Tarrant R, Johnston D, Tuffin K. Are you ready? Emergency preparedness in New Zealand schools. Int J Disast Risk Re. 2017;25:324-33.
25. Snow K, Tulloch S, Ochalski H, O’Gorman M. Reconciliation, resilience and resistance in Inuit teachers' professional development and practices. Educ North. 2018;25(1-2):108-34
26. Ronan KR, Haynes K, Towers B, Alisic E, Ireland N, Amri A, et al. Child-centred disaster risk reduction: Can disaster resilience programs reduce risk and increase the resilience of children and households? Aust J Emerg Manag. 2016;31(3):49.
27. Thi T, Shaw R. School-based disaster risk reduction education in primary schools in Da Nang City, Central Vietnam. Environ Haz. 2016;15(4):356-73.
28. Shiwaku K, Shaw R, Chandra Kandel R, Narayan Shrestha S, Mani Dixit A. Future perspective of school disaster education in Nepal. Disaster Prev Manag. 2007;16(4):576-87.
29. Cavioni V, Zanetti MA, Beddia G, Spagnolo ML. Promoting Resilience: A European Curriculum for Students, Teachers and Families. Resilience in Education: Springer; 2018. p. 313-32.
30. Mwangi CN, Ireri AM, Mwaniki EW, Wambugu SK. Relationship among type of school, academic resilience and academic achievement among secondary school students in kiambu county, KENYA. People Int J Soc Sci. 2017;3(3):1092-107.
31. Öcal A, Topkaya Y. Earthquake preparedness in schools in seismic hazard regions in the South-East of Turkey. Disaster Prev Manag. 2011;20(3):334-48.
32. Kokcu A, Kuguoglu S, Ergun A. An assessment of emergency and disaster preparedness in high schools in Istanbul-Turkey. HealthMED. 2012;6(8):2620.
33. Brymer M, Layne C, Jacobs A, Pynoos R, Ruzek J, Steinberg A, et al. Psychological first aid field operations guide. National Child Traumatic Stress Network. 2006.
34. Ozmen F. The level of preparedness of the schools for disasters from the aspect of the school principals. Disaster Prev Manag. 2006;15(3):383-95.
How to Cite
Mirzaei S, Dehghani-Tafti A-A, Mohammadinia L, Nasiriani K, Rahaei Z, Falahzadeh H, Amiri H. Operational Strategies for Establishing Disaster-Resilient Schools: A Qualitative Study. Adv J Emerg Med. 4(2):e23.
Original article