A 26-Year-Old Man with Headache

  • Mehran Sotoodehnia ORCID Mail Department of Emergency Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


In this case, changes are made to the shape or amplitude of ECG complexes change alternatively. In the most common form, alternative changes can be viewed better in QRS complexes and in mid precordial leads. These alternative changes can be seen simultaneously in every other QRS complex and T wave. This means that in one beat the amplitude or shape of QRS complexes and T wave are normal and in the next beat the amplitude or shape of QRS complexes and T wave change. Since at times QRS complexes get closer, then they collapse and overlap and after that they gain distance from each other again. The answer to this ECG is a heterotropic transplanted heart.




Download data is not yet available.


1. Smith JM, Clancy EA, Valeri CR, Ruskin JN, Cohen RJ. Electrical alternans and cardiac electrical instability. Circulation. 1988;77(1):110-21.
2. Fox JJ, McHarg JL, Gilmour RF. Ionic mechanism of electrical alternans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;282(2):H516-H30.
3. Spencker S, Müller D, Mochmann H-C. Pericardial effusion and electrical alternans. Resuscitation. 2008;76(2):163-4.
4. Mattu A, Brady WJ. ECGs for the emergency physician 2: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
5. Fotiadis D, Likas A, Michalis L, Papaloukas C. Electrocardiogram (ECG): automated diagnosis. Wiley encyclopedia of biomedical engineering. 2006.
6. Pascale P, Pruvot E, Graf D. Pacemaker Syndrome During Managed Ventricular Pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;20:574-6.
7. Israel C, Ekosso-Ejangue L, Sheta M. Analysis of pacemaker ECGs. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2015;26(3):260-73.
8. Verlato R, Baccillieri MS, Turrini P. Pacemaker Malfunction: Myth or Reality? The Arrhythmic Patient in the Emergency Department: Springer; 2016. p. 163-75.
9. Hesselson AB. Simplified Interpretation of Pacemaker ECGs: An Introduction: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
10. Fåhraeus T. Pacemaker electrocardiography. Comprehensive Electrocardiology: Springer; 2010. p. 1767-92.
11. Newcomb AE, Esmore DS, Rosenfeldt FL, Richardson M, Marasco SF. Heterotopic heart transplantation: an expanding role in the twenty-first century? Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(4):1345-50.
12. John R, Liao K. Orthotopic heart transplantation. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;15(2):138-46.
13. Liao KK, John R, Shumway SJ. Orthotopic Heart Transplantation. Congestive Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation: Springer; 2017. p. 431-47.
14. Lefroy DC, Fang JC, Stevenson LW, Hartley LH, Friedman PL, Stevenson WG. Recipient-to-donor atrioatrial conduction after orthotopic heart transplantation: surface electrocardiographic features and estimated prevalence. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(4):444-50.
15. MacLachlan HI, Dalzell JR. An Unusual Electrocardiogram in a Heart Transplant Recipient. Am J Med. 2015;128(7):e7-e8.
16. Kerensky RA, Leontiadis E, Magninas A, Cokkinos DV. Heterotopic heart transplantation. Clin Cardiol. 2004;27(5):280-.
17. Kadner A, Chen RH, Adams DH. Heterotopic heart transplantation: experimental development and clinical experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(4):474-81.
How to Cite
Sotoodehnia M. A 26-Year-Old Man with Headache. Adv J Emerg Med. 1(1):e10.
Electrocardiogram interpretation